A plan to turn a family home in Burton into a seven-room studio was rejected by planners.
The house at 310 Shobnall Street in the town is said to have become a seven-bed multi-occupancy house (HMO) with space for two cars, but a planning request was denied by East Staffordshire Borough Council .
In addition to making modifications to the house, the request included the construction of a one-story rear extension and another extension for second-floor housing.
TOP STORY: Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s and Waitrose announce new mask rules
An Ambergate Assets report submitted alongside the request to East Staffordshire Borough Council said: “A total of seven individually rented rooms would be created and each would benefit from an en-suite bathroom. The property would also include a spacious communal kitchen with dining area.
“A total of two off-street parking spaces would be provided at the rear of the plot, which would be accessed by the private service road. “
The report went on to say that Shobnall needed starting homes, homes suitable for young families and affordable housing.
He added: “The proposed development aims to utilize the existing space in the building and, in conjunction with reasonable extensions and additions, would help advance shared housing.
“HMOs play an important role in meeting local housing needs and the proposal will help meet the needs of people who may not be able to afford a house or rent a separate apartment. The type of housing created would serve as a stepping stone to the housing market and is located in a sustainable location where a choice can be made on modes of transport and where there is access to a number of amenities and services.
The proposal provides for two parking spaces for the seven-bed apartment, and the report adds: “There is evidence that HMO accommodation has generally significantly reduced the number of cars and sustainability benchmarks due to the location of the site. must also be taken into account. A reduced level of parking is therefore justified, while priority has been given to the integration of new, safe and accessible parking to overcome any dependence purely on availability on the street. “
However, the town planning officers of the borough council did not agree and indicated in their reasons for refusing the request that “the proposal would lead to a significant deficit in the parking arrangements for the proposed use”.
They also said: “The proposal would result in the loss of a family home and no evidence has been provided to demonstrate the need for a multi-occupancy home there.
“The proposal would result in a clearly insufficient amenity space to serve the proposed house for multiple occupancy, which would have a negative impact on the amenity and residential environment of future occupants. “
- Get the latest news emailed straight to your inbox – click here