close
Parking facilities

ERA, councils oppose nine-story building overlooking Wied Għomor

The environmental watchdog, two local councils, NGOs and dozens of residents have opposed a proposal to transform a site previously intended for a 26-story hotel into a nine-story building of offices, shops and residences, located on the edge of the Wied Għomor Valley protected area, in St Julian’s.

Opponents say the site, although located in the development zone, is designated as open public space locally and should remain so.

The site is located just outside the regional road tunnels.

Landowner Carmelo Borg has submitted a “development control” request to change the site’s zoning and allow for mixed-use development.

It offers four floors of underground car parks and offices, shops and a residential development above.

One level would include sports and community facilities.

The land has been in the Borg family for generations and part of it was expropriated in the 1960s for the construction of the regional road.

Last year, Borg entered into a promise to sell agreement with TUM Invest Limited, which planned to build the hotel on several floors. The plans failed after a barrage of objections and the company changed its mind.

The 3000 square meter land is located in the development area. However, locally it is not designated for development but rather as an open public space.

St Julian’s mayor Albert Buttigieg said the project was “inappropriate”.

The local plan of 2006 specified precisely that the locality lacked open public spaces, at a time when “the situation was less chaotic and congested than today”.

“St Julian’s is suffocated, overdeveloped and crowded. It desperately needs open spaces – open green spaces – and not an excess of new commercial and residential development.

“There is a large supermarket and a shopping complex a few meters from the site. The rezoning will lead to an intensification of development and an increase in density, ”Buttigieg wrote in his objection.

The Environment and Resources Authority (ERA) said it had “reservations” and recommended that the site remain an open space. He said he would be able to make further comments if a more detailed environmental review was required.

The mayor of Swieqi, Noel Muscat, said the ecologically important valley must be protected at all costs “not only against inappropriate developments in the valley itself but also on its banks”.

“The sacrifice of land allocated to open public space, from which the general public will benefit, in favor of property for the enjoyment of a few, will set an unfortunate precedent which will lead to the further decimation of the open spaces available to the public. public. . It cannot be allowed, ”he added.

Environmental NGOs, including Din l-Art Ħelwa, argued that the loss of open spaces, the increase in development density and the introduction of conflicting activities through the mixed-use element “would have an impact. debilitating on the surroundings ”.

Independent journalism costs money. Support Times of Malta for the price of a coffee.

Support us


Source link

read more
Car park management

The history of “bad parking lots” is scandalous. But it will continue to happen unless we close the subsidy loopholes

On Monday, a Senate hearing produced even more damning evidence on the “parking rorts” case.

The Australian National Audit Office told a parliamentary committee that a list of the top 20 fringe electorates guided the distribution of a $ 389 million parking lot construction fund during the 2019 election campaign.

Members of the Sitting Coalition were invited to propose projects for funding. In some cases, funds were allocated to voters when a project had not yet been identified. An adviser to the Prime Minister’s Office was involved in the allocation of the funds – the same adviser implicated in the “sports rorts” incident.

Earlier this month, the Audit Office released a scathing report, finding that 77% of the selected commuter parking sites were in coalition electorates, rather than in areas of real need with problems with parking. congestion. None of the 47 project sites selected for funding commitment were proposed by the infrastructure department.

So why do these rorts keep happening? What mechanisms are in place to try to stop them? And what other protections do we need?

Why do rorts continue to occur?

The pig barrel involves funneling public funds to government electorates for political purposes, rather than an appropriate allocation based on merit.

In recent years we have been inundated with scandals related to pork barrels. This includes the “sports rorts” scandal that led to Bridget McKenzie’s resignation from cabinet last year, and NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s biased cast of the Stronger Communities fund.

The Court of Auditors delivered a damning assessment of the Coalition’s parking fund.
Mick Tsikas / AAP

Australia has a single-member parliamentary system, which makes it more vulnerable to pig rolls than multi-member electorates like Norway or Spain. The belief is that politicians who “bring the bacon home” for their constituents are electorally rewarded for doing so.

This means that the central cabinet is encouraged to strategically distribute the benefits to marginal electorates in order to increase the chances of electoral success. There is also an incentive to skew the distribution of funds in favor of the ruling party.

In short, crime scandals continue to occur because governments believe that funneling money to marginal and government electorates will allow them to win elections.

What are the terms of accountability for grants?

At the federal level, we have sophisticated financial management legislation that provides a framework for grant rules. The Commonwealth Grant Rules provide a detailed set of guidelines for ministers and government officials to follow on grant application and selection processes.



Read more: Another day, another rorts scandal – this time with the parking lots. How can we fix the system?


However, there are significant loopholes in the rules. For example, the “bad parking” scandal is not covered by these rules because it is money that passes through the States.

In addition, there are no penalties for non-compliance with the rules. Thus, ministers and government officials can break the rules without repercussions.

Who monitors the grants?

The Auditor General is the main actor investigating the federal grant administration. The Auditor General has significant enforcement powers and is independent from government. Although the Auditor General does not have the power to change government practices, the publicity of his reports can encourage government agencies to respond positively and productively.

In Australia, parliaments have an important constitutional role as oversight of government activities.

Executive Director of the Australian National Audit Office Brian Boyd
Australian National Audit Office executive director Brian Boyd appeared before a Senate committee on Monday.
Lukas Coch / AAP

Parliamentary committees have become the main form of government oversight in recent years. They are set up to investigate specific policy issues or to assess government performance.

Parliamentary committees are normally responsible for investigating issues by taking submissions, hearing testimony and reporting their findings to parliament. They have been very effective in identifying and investigating issues related to government crimes.

What destination now?

To fix the system, we need to reform the rules for awarding grants and close the loopholes. We also need to impose penalties for breaking the rules.



Read more: The “sports rorts” case shows the need for a real federal ICAC – with teeth


It is imperative that our grant administration system be reformed to ensure that taxpayer funds are protected from government abuse. If the ministerial discretion available in grant processes is misused, it can lead to political patronage and corruption.

Ministers, as our elected representatives, are the guardians of the public trust. In a well-functioning democracy, it is important that there is probity, transparency and accountability in the use of public funds.


Source link

read more
Parking space

Bangor City Council approves ordinance allowing more housing units

BANGOR, Maine (WABI) – The city of Bangor voted on Friday to approve an ordinance that will result in the construction of more housing units in the city.

The updated ordinance reduces the lot size for each unit, including a drop from two parking spaces per unit to one.

City council members say the additional parking space is not needed due to the pedestrian nature of the affected neighborhoods.

The ordinance is a first step in helping meet the city’s goal of creating more housing units near the Bangor business district.

“So really what we’re trying to do is encourage the redevelopment and construction of new buildings in dense, pedestrianized neighborhoods,” said Tanya Emery, director of community and economic development for Bangor. “We are grateful to see a continuous and constant flow of these small redevelopment projects, and then we have engaged with the developers on a number of larger housing projects, which we hope will come to fruition here in Bangor,” and provide some of that much needed housing inventory that we know people are clamoring for.

One of these projects could include adding new units to an existing building on Ohio Street. These proposals flow from the recommendations of the Affordable Housing Task Force.

Copyright 2021 WABI. All rights reserved.

read more
Parking facilities

Plan to turn family home into seven beds in Burton denied

A plan to turn a family home in Burton into a seven-room studio was rejected by planners.

The house at 310 Shobnall Street in the town is said to have become a seven-bed multi-occupancy house (HMO) with space for two cars, but a planning request was denied by East Staffordshire Borough Council .

In addition to making modifications to the house, the request included the construction of a one-story rear extension and another extension for second-floor housing.

TOP STORY: Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, Asda, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s and Waitrose announce new mask rules

An Ambergate Assets report submitted alongside the request to East Staffordshire Borough Council said: “A total of seven individually rented rooms would be created and each would benefit from an en-suite bathroom. The property would also include a spacious communal kitchen with dining area.

“A total of two off-street parking spaces would be provided at the rear of the plot, which would be accessed by the private service road. “

The report went on to say that Shobnall needed starting homes, homes suitable for young families and affordable housing.

He added: “The proposed development aims to utilize the existing space in the building and, in conjunction with reasonable extensions and additions, would help advance shared housing.

“HMOs play an important role in meeting local housing needs and the proposal will help meet the needs of people who may not be able to afford a house or rent a separate apartment. The type of housing created would serve as a stepping stone to the housing market and is located in a sustainable location where a choice can be made on modes of transport and where there is access to a number of amenities and services.

The proposal provides for two parking spaces for the seven-bed apartment, and the report adds: “There is evidence that HMO accommodation has generally significantly reduced the number of cars and sustainability benchmarks due to the location of the site. must also be taken into account. A reduced level of parking is therefore justified, while priority has been given to the integration of new, safe and accessible parking to overcome any dependence purely on availability on the street. “

However, the town planning officers of the borough council did not agree and indicated in their reasons for refusing the request that “the proposal would lead to a significant deficit in the parking arrangements for the proposed use”.

They also said: “The proposal would result in the loss of a family home and no evidence has been provided to demonstrate the need for a multi-occupancy home there.

“The proposal would result in a clearly insufficient amenity space to serve the proposed house for multiple occupancy, which would have a negative impact on the amenity and residential environment of future occupants. “

  • Get the latest news emailed straight to your inbox – click here


Source link

read more
Car park management

Vontier Acquires DRB Systems, LLC for Approximately $ 965 Million, Provides Second Quarter 2021 Financial Performance Update

RALEIGH, NC – (COMMERCIAL THREAD) – Vontier Corporation (“Vontier”) (NYSE: VNT) announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DRB Systems, LLC (“DRB”), a leading supplier of point of sale, workflow software and control solutions to the car wash industry, subsidiaries of New Mountain Capital LLC for approximately $ 965 million in cash. The acquisition will be subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval, and will be funded with available cash and proceeds from borrowings under Vontier’s credit facilities. Vontier expects the acquisition to be completed in the third quarter of 2021.

Based in Akron, OH, DRB was founded in 1984 and employs over 500 people in North America. The company’s portfolio of trusted brands includes DRB Tunnel Solutions, DRB In-Bay Solutions (formerly Unitec®), Suds Creative ™, eGenuity®, Washify®, InvoMax ™, Auto Data ™ and Sage Microsystems ™. DRB is owned by New Mountain Capital, a New York-based investment firm.

Mark Morelli, President and CEO of Vontier, said: “The acquisition of DRB should accelerate our strategy of portfolio diversification towards long-term growth drivers in attractive markets and establish a portfolio of sales solutions in the region. retail $ 500 million. DRB’s focus on technology and software solutions complements our existing point-of-sale and payment offerings and improves our growth and recurring revenue profile, profitability and free cash flow generation.

The DRB acquisition aligns with our goal of smart infrastructure and offers compelling opportunities for expansion beyond its current end markets. In addition, its entry into the high value-added segment of the car wash industry allows Vontier to increasingly benefit from the growing demand for clean and efficient mobility solutions and key trends, including autonomous vehicles and water conservation. We look forward to working with the DRB team to provide an extensive suite of solutions to meet the industry’s growing needs for workflow technology and expertise.

Vontier expects DRB to generate around $ 170 million in revenue in 2021 with average operating margins of 20% and is expected to have a long-term single-digit growth rate. The purchase price of the acquisition is approximately $ 965 million and includes a deferred tax asset of approximately $ 130 million, which we expect to be able to use over the next 15 years.

Peter Masucci, Managing Director of New Mountain Capital, said: “We are proud of the successful partnership with DRB and the tremendous business development that has taken place since our investment in October 2017. Under the ownership of New Mountain Capital, DRB has experienced a significant growth while tripling the dollars. dedicated to product development and innovation. We thank the management team and the employees of DRB and wish Vontier continued success with DRB in the years to come.

VONTIER’S SECOND QUARTER 2021 PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Vontier also announced today that it expects second quarter 2021 basic revenue growth and adjusted diluted net income per share to be higher than previously announced by the company, primarily due to a increased demand for retail solutions and auto repair offerings.

ABOUT VONTIER

Vontier is a global industrial technology company focused on transportation and mobility solutions. The company’s portfolio of trusted brands includes leading expertise in mobility technologies, commercial and commercial refueling, fleet management, telematics, vehicle diagnostics and repair and smart city end markets. Vontier’s innovative products, services and software improve efficiency, safety, security and environmental compliance around the world.

Guided by Vontier’s proven business system and unwavering commitment to continuous improvement and customer success, Vontier maintains traffic through over 90,000 intersections, serves over 260,000 customer refueling sites, monitors more than 480,000 commercial vehicles and equips more than 600,000 automotive technicians worldwide. . Vontier’s innovation history, margin profile and cash flow characteristics should support continued investment in a range of compelling organic growth and capital deployment opportunities. Vontier mobilizes the future to create a better world.

ABOUT THE NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL

New Mountain Capital is a New York-based investment firm that emphasizes business development and growth, rather than leverage, as it seeks long-term capital appreciation. The company currently manages private equity, credit, net rental real estate and public equity funds with more than $ 30 billion in assets under management. New Mountain Capital seeks out what it believes to be the highest quality growth leaders in carefully selected industry sectors, then works intensely with management to create value in these companies. Additional information on New Mountain Capital is available at www.newmountaincapital.com.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws regarding Vontier, DRB and the acquisition of DRB by Vontier. Statements in this press release that are not strictly historical, including statements regarding the proposed acquisition, the expected timing and conditions of the acquisition, future product solutions, the future financial and operational impact, or the results of acquisition, expected financial performance for Vontier, prospects for DRB or the industry following the acquisition, future growth opportunities following the acquisition, future synergy and any other statements regarding events or developments that Vontier expects or anticipates will occur or may occur in the future, are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. These statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the business and acquisition opportunities and anticipated profits of Vontier Corporation (the “Company”), as well as any other statement identified by the use of words such as ” anticipate ”,“ expect ”,“ believe ”,“ prospect ”,“ direction ”or“ will ”or other words having a similar meaning. There are a number of important risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results, developments and business decisions to differ materially from those suggested or indicated by these forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. prospective. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the duration and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the deterioration or instability of the economy, the markets we serve, international trade policies and financial markets, contractions or declining growth rates and cyclicality of the markets we serve, competition, changes in industry standards and government regulations that may have a negative impact on demand for our products or our costs, our ability to identify, consume, integrate and successfully realize the anticipated value of appropriate acquisitions and complete divestitures and other divestitures; our ability to successfully develop and market new products, software and services and to grow over time. new markets, potential for inappropriate conduct by our employees, agents or business partners, impact of divestitures, contingent liabilities related to acquisitions and divestitures, the impact of changes in tax laws, our compliance with applicable laws and regulations and changes in applicable laws and regulations, risks related to international economic, political, legal, compliance and trade factors , risks related to the potential impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, exchange rates, tax audits and changes in our tax rate and income taxes, the impact of our debts on our operations, litigation and other contingent liabilities, including intellectual property and environmental, health and safety matters, our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, risks associated with product, service or software defects , product liability and recalls, risks associated with product manufacturing, our relationships with and the performance of our partners s distribution, commodity costs and supplements, our ability to adjust purchasing and manufacturing capacity to reflect market conditions, reliance on single sources of supply, security breaches or others disruptions to our information systems, the adverse effects of restructuring activities, the impact of changes to US GAAP, labor issues and disruptions related to natural and man-made disasters. Additional information regarding factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements can be found in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. These forward-looking statements represent Vontier’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this release and Vontier assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events and developments. or otherwise.


Source link

read more
Parking space

The agenda: briefs from local governments for 19.19.21

A map of the 334 acre The Aire site in Westchester, just west of Westchester Commons on Route 288 and Midlothian Turnpike. (Courtesy of Chesterfield County)

Proposed 334 acre mixed-use development adjacent to Westchester Commons

The Chesterfield Planning Commission is due to meet on Tuesday. Full agenda here.

Commissioners are expected to assess a rezoning application from GrayCo Properties that would pave the way for a 334-acre mixed-use development by HHHunt Communities called The Aire in Westchester, in the Magisterial District of Midlothian.

The development would be adjacent to Westchester Commons, which itself is slated for an infill residential project. The Area at Westchester would rise north of Midlothian Turnpike, west of Highway 288 and Watkins Center Drive, and east of Huguenot Springs Road.

The development would include townhouses, single-family homes and apartments, with the total number of proposed residential units of 2,215 units. The development would also include 200,000 square feet of commercial space.

A conceptual site plan of how the GRTC temporary transfer station would be set up in the city-owned parking lot. (Courtesy of the City of Richmond)

Provisional GRTC transfer station on the town planning agenda on Monday

The Richmond Planning Commission meets at 1:30 p.m. on Monday. Business on the agenda includes the review of a planned temporary GRTC transfer station in the city-owned parking lot between Eighth and Ninth Streets and between Leigh and Clay Streets.

The relocation of the current layout to Ninth Street would make way for the redevelopment of the Public Security Building site, where a 20-story tower and a mixed-use office complex are planned.

The transfer station is expected to be in place for up to 10 years. The 64 public parking spaces on the lot would be removed and municipal government spaces would be reduced from 199 to 34. A dozen street spaces along Eighth Street would also be affected, and seven spaces are expected to remain.

Also on the agenda is a special use request for a proposed art gallery at 205 W. Brookland Park Blvd. Full agenda here.

‘Greater Scott’s Addition’, zoning changes north of Fan advance

At its previous meeting on July 6, the city’s Planning Commission voted to recommend the proposed zoning changes for the “Greater Scott’s Addition” area and properties along the Pulse Corridor generally north of Broad Street from of the Fan district.

The commission suspended for six months a review of Richmond’s year-old rules to regulate short-term home rentals in the city. The commission now plans to review the rules in January.

Hanover County to Begin Full Plan Review

Hanover County is expected to soon begin its regular process of reviewing and updating its comprehensive plan, which is the county’s long-term roadmap for development, land use and growth.

A review of the Strategic Zoning Initiative policy, as well as solar farm policies, agri-food policies, mixed-use zoning, housing and development plans for specific corridors in the county are among the focus points. departure that county staff identified for updating the plan. planning director David Maloney told county supervisors during an introductory presentation on the effort last month.

At this point, it is difficult to say which elements of the plan could be changed. The review process will be informed by feedback gathered from county officials and county residents.

The county plans to field a consultant by early October to help them with their last regular review of their comprehensive plan, and that consultant will work alongside a traffic consultant in the review, Maloney told BizSense on July 9th. The county has allocated $ 300,000 to hire. design offices for the exam.

In November, the Planning Commission and the Oversight Board will meet to agree on housing demographics and trends and land use analysis to inform the review. The public engagement period is scheduled for fall and winter 2021 and 2022. Preliminary recommendations are expected by spring 2022, with early adoption of the updated plan by winter 2023.

read more
Car parking rate

New Rules Proposed To Curb Colorado Suburban Businesses | New

The state of Colorado wants all major businesses in the Denver metro area to track what their employees are doing before and after work when it comes to commuting.

He wants these employers to “increase parking fees” for gasoline-powered vehicles, appoint an “employee transportation coordinator” to administer programs that reduce “single occupancy vehicle” trips and offer transportation passes. jointly fully or partially subsidized – even if the company is not where close to everything.

And he wants those plans of 2,764 companies employing some 900,000 employees – which could cost between $ 7,200 and $ 811,643 a year to implement – by Jan. 1, 2022, according to state records.

The effort dubbed the Employee Travel Reduction Program, part of legislation passed in 2019 to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Colorado, comes as businesses recover from a year of pandemic which has seen entire industries shut down and unemployment soar.

Some businesses are understandably concerned about the new regulations, officials from the Denver Subway Chamber of Commerce, Denver South Economic Development Partnership and Colorado Business Roundtable said.

“We recognize that air quality is an important issue and the business community recognizes the need for action – many are already taking these steps,” said Thomas Book, President and CEO of Denver South. But he asks the state “what can you do to put in place a voluntary or regulated program in such a way as to have a significant impact on air quality and to do so in a way that is least intrusive to the public. business world, whose function after all is to run a business.

First round of aerial surveys of emissions from Boulder, Weld and Larimer counties

The House and Denver South on Friday submitted comments to the Colorado Air Quality Control Board – the nine-citizen panel made up of people appointed by Governor Jared Polis, up to five of whom can be from the same political party .

The commission will meet in mid-August to develop the rules and regulations, after receiving a full report from the Air Pollution Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, including a economic impact report and the contribution of 25 stakeholders (such as the Chamber).

Polis signs clean energy and water bills during Denver stops

ETRP lives Regulation n ° 22 under Colorado’s greenhouse gas reporting and emission reduction requirements.

These demands came from the Colorado legislature through HB19-1261 Climate action plan to reduce pollution, which Polis promulgated in May 2019. It included ambitious goals, without the assertion of many criticisms specific to the implementation, to reduce “greenhouse gas emissions 2025 at least 26%, 2030 greenhouse gas emissions of at least 50%, and 2050 greenhouse gas emissions of at least 90% of greenhouse gas emission levels at statewide that existed in 2005.

To help achieve this, the Travel Reduction Program has been put in place.

These are 10 pages of regulations that would impact large companies, defined as 100 or more employees, in the area labeled “8 hour ozone control zone” which includes counties: Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas and Jefferson. It also includes the city and county of Denver, of course, with Broomfield and parts of Weld and Larimer counties.

The regulations describe an employee not only as an employee, or as a salary, but also as “any person in the service of an employer, within the framework of a rental contract”. Each of these employees or contractors should be asked about how they get to work, the type of vehicle they drive, the distance to travel from their home.

Then, in an effort to reduce “single occupancy vehicle” trips during peak hours, the employer needs to offer things like shuttles for employees, flexible hours for those who drive electric vehicles, options for driving. carpooling and carpooling, passes for subsidized public transport, bicycle parking and showers, among others.

Cost estimates vary widely depending on the size of the business and the travel reduction efforts implemented, from $ 7,200 to $ 800,000. But state officials dispute the cost “exaggerations” and say the programs could save employers and employees money in the long run.

“A lot of these things will be net savings in the end,” said Clay Clarke, supervisor of the air pollution control division’s climate unit, saying the report’s estimate of $ 800,000 “assumed to unrealistically that an employer would use more expensive options such as providing transit passes at a daily rate rather than monthly.

“What we’ll hear from transportation managers who have seen these programs in place is that the actual cost information is much lower than these high-end estimates.”

He also took issue with “misinformation” that the transportation coordinator needs a full-time position or a new hire.

“It’s not a full-time employee worth the work,” he said. “Many companies already have an employee who probably does. “

The Division documented its outreach efforts: 3,686 letters mailed; five large listing sessions with nearly 800 participants, seven listening sessions specifically for the ETRP with nearly 500 registrants, 25 stakeholder meetings and 90 written comments.

“The idea is to provide (employees) with incentives and flexible options for industry or businesses,” Clark said.

The cost of the travel reduction program is only one of the concerns of business groups regarding the proposed regulation.

“This is a real legal question,” said Laura Giocomo Rizzo, senior vice president of external affairs for the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce. “How can an employer be responsible for an employee’s behavior outside of working hours? You could buy each employee a bike, charge $ 1,000 for parking, but at the end of the day we live in a country where people work as they want or can. It punishes employers and puts them in a strange position. “

While the proposed regulation excludes employees who use the car “as part of their professional responsibility for emergency response”, it does not exclude single mothers who have childcare responsibilities or employees who care for them. sick or elderly parents, said Giocomo Rizzo.

“This is another example of a legislature passing vague laws, but the details are where the rubber really hits the road,” she said, highlighting the other example of the equal pay law recently. implementation that causes some companies to exclude Colorado residents as candidates. .

The Colorado Business Roundtable, a public policy organization with “executives from some of the state’s largest employers,” sent a notice to all members opposing the program.

“We share a common goal of getting clean air and a healthy environment, but incentives and education are much better tools than regulations and penalties,” the statement sent by email said. “With the Commission estimating that the cost of implementing the program could reach up to $ 800,000 per year for large employers, the economic impact would be devastating and would likely result in job losses and higher prices for consumers. . After the global pandemic and witnessing the economic upheaval of a lifetime, the Coloradans should remain focused on economic recovery, not new regulations. “

Brook said Denver South, which represents some 250,000 employees and is “one of the largest employment regions in the state,” hopes the regulations will be made voluntary or come with no penalties.

The organization has raised similar concerns about whether employers “have the right or the legal authority to regulate an employee’s behavior” when they are off the clock.

“We also don’t think it takes into account companies’ access to public transportation or the level of it,” Brook said. “There are very disparate levels of access to public transit. “

The regulations could also disproportionately affect “blue collar” employers such as those in the service or manufacturing sectors.

ON THE COVER: LOADING AHEAD |  What does Colorado need to do to put nearly a million electric vehicles on the road by 2030?

“A lot of these white collar jobs, like customer service hotline, can potentially be done from home,” said Brook, which means these employers can get credit for these single occupant vehicle travel reductions. , but employers like a grocery store or restaurant whose employees who must be physically at work will be penalized.

There is also the problem of companies with less than 100 employees who would be hesitant to expand here if it imposed all ETRP regulations on them, he said.

“We know the health department is in a tough spot here and the Air Quality (Control) Commission is facing a serious problem,” with dangerous ozone levels, Brook said. “We want to work together to find a solution that will solve the problem while allowing employers to continue to recover from the Covid-19 crisis. “


Source link

read more
Parking facilities

The town of Quepem has been asking for a parking space for decades

Jul 19, 2021 | 6:23 AM HIST

The town of Quepem has been asking for a parking space for decades

Christian and Pednekar

QUEPEM: The Quepem Municipal Market area is jam-packed with unplanned illegal construction since the expansion of Quepem Municipality in 1985. Urgent civic needs are being ignored. Parking is a headache in Quepem due to space constraints. Quepem’s vision of development has been lost in people’s priorities and interests for decades.

At least for now, their priority should be to identify the right places in and around the usual overcrowded areas for vehicle parking and bus stops. People say that the real responsibilities of the local MP are ignored in this agreement.

A resident of Vallabh Prabhudesai said: “The biggest drawback to Quepem, which is the crescent of four constituencies and the administrative seat of around 10 offices, is that it still lacks basic parking facilities. The municipality must make a quick decision for the well-being of Quepem residents.

Another local Angelista Da Costa said: “As far as I know, the Municipality of Quepem started operations in 1985, although 37 years have passed since then a reasonable parking solution has not yet been found. It is a puzzle for people who come to the administrative headquarters for their work. A quick solution to this parking problem is needed at the earliest.

Local businessman Avadhut Sukhtankar said: “The main problem with the parking lot is that the Municipality of Quepem does not have its own property. The land which is used for parking in the Quepem market area is mainly private and no seriousness is shown on the part of the authorities concerned to tackle or find a solution to this problem.

Curchorem resident James Fernandes said: “The Municipality of Quepem has neglected parking lots for many years now. In fact, this should have been a priority because Quepem is the administrative headquarters. Due to the unavailability of parking spaces, there is a tendency to park along the road, which can lead to accidents.


Source link

read more
Car park management

Coventry resident fined over £ 2,000 for parking on his own path

A Coventry resident spoke out after receiving over £ 2,000 in parking fines on his OWN drive.

The individual, who asked to remain anonymous, said he received “mounds of threatening letters” in less than three years, which left him “desperate” and “distressed”.

The resident rents from a private landlord at Bannerbrook Park and pays extra as part of their rent for the privilege of parking in an allocated parking area.

Read more: Coventry school cancels end-of-year trips to Drayton Manor after ‘multiple outbreaks’ of Covid

But the problems initially arose when the resident sold his car and forgot to withdraw his license – and when he made a phone call to have it replaced, Mainstay Residential told him there was no license. available because they were sold out.

He was told that he would be sent one for the new car when it became available and that in the meantime an exemption would be put in place while he waited.

However, UK Parking Control ignored the exemption and started fining the tenant for parking in their own space.

Things got worse

When the individual resold his car, meaning he needed a new license, the same thing happened.

But things got even worse when UKPC lost the Mainstay Residential contract, and it was taken over by a similar company called Parking Control Management.

The man explained, “I kept my license on display, but no one sent me a letter saying I needed to update it with the new company, and I received seven fines in about three days.

“I tried to talk to them about it, but they said they were sending the case to their lawyers to take care of it – even though they didn’t tell me I needed it. of a new license. “

“It was just parasitic that they mistreated me”

With both parking companies claiming that it now owed them more than £ 1,000 each, the stress began to take its toll.

“First of all, it was irritating,” he said. “It was just parasitic that they mistreated me. Basically, intimidated me.

“I got to the point where I felt really scared about it. You know I was literally so stressed out about it all because there were loads of letters demanding that I pay money, menacingly, that they were going to bypass house type thing.

“There was absolutely no legal basis to say they were going to sue me. So yeah, I was feeling really stressed out, really desperate, that was ridiculous.”

‘I’m their client, it’s their job to take care of me’

He added: “As a tenant, I pay the parking management company a charge on my rent every month, so I’m their customer, it’s their job to take care of me, and they pay them and outsource parking for this so that this company basically protects my space from strangers.

“It is very obviously my space, at the residence where I live, the address where the car is registered, it is clear as day that it is my space, but I cannot make them understand.

“I’m on my nerves to be honest.”

CoventryLive contacted Mainstay Residential for more information and they admitted the charges were wrong.

A spokesperson for the property management company said: “We understand that the parking fees issued were in error and we apologize for any distress caused by this misunderstanding.

“We have spoken with our parking control provider to resolve this issue and are happy to have been able to confirm that all charges have now been canceled.”

Keep up to date with all the latest local news with our daily newsletter


Source link

read more
Parking space

Publix to anchor East San Marco Mall in Jacksonville

Residents waited about 18 years for the first shovelful to be turned on the construction of the East San Marco shopping center anchored by a new Publix supermarket built on top of a parking lot.

The project – which also includes a separate Publix liquor store, Orangetheory fitness center, and other retail stores – is well underway at the corner of Hendricks Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard in historic San Marco in Jacksonville.

“The provisional opening date is scheduled for the end of the second quarter [second quarter] of 2022, ”Chris Norberg, community relations manager for the Jacksonville division of Publix, said in an email to The Times-Union.

Dirt moves in East San Marco: Beginning of the first work on the project after 18 years of waiting

Publix is ​​coming: Supermarket, parking structure in East San Marco

Norberg declined to comment on the supermarket’s planned amenities.

Previously released plans show the 38,294-square-foot supermarket will be above a first-floor parking garage. Escalators will take shoppers to the grocery store.

Construction is well advanced on Publix which will anchor the East San Marco shopping center at the corner of Hendricks Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard.

Publix officials said in 2019 that the East San Marco store would be the first in Jacksonville built above a parking structure. But there are several with a similar design in the supermarket chain’s multi-state service area, they said.

Eric Davidson, a spokesperson for developer Regency Centers, told The Times-Union that construction on the project is going well.

“We are still on schedule to complete our construction after the summer of next year,” he said. “At this point, we will then hand over our spaces to our new tenants, who can then update how long their construction will take. ”

New movie theaters:Cinemark 14 takes center stage in Jacksonville’s new mall

Update:Aging and obsolete Roosevelt Square turns into modern Ortega Park

Update:RH Jacksonville Brings Luxury Home Goods and Rooftop Restaurants to Downtown St. Johns

Right now, the concrete block is rising, but there is still a lot of work to be done, Davidson said, noting that despite the weather and the COVID-19 pandemic “we are still on schedule.”

Davidson said Regency Centers is in talks with potential tenants and concepts to join Publix and Orangetheory in East San Marco, but nothing has been finalized and ready to announce.

Construction of the new East San Marco shopping center anchored by the Publix supermarket is well underway at the corner of Hendricks Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard.

The project has been in operation since the early 2000s. The recession as well as the withdrawal of a residential development partner were among the factors cited over the years for the repeated delays.

Finally, a groundbreaking ceremony held on February 16 kicked off construction.

In addition to the supermarket, the project also includes a 1,430 square foot Publix liquor store and another 18,800 square foot “shell” retail or restaurant space for other tenants, according to building permits. and project plans.

An architectural drawing shows the East San Marco shopping center project on Hendricks Avenue and Atlantic Boulevard.

Publix East of San Marco

  • Address: 2039 avenue Hendricks, at the intersection of avenue Hendricks and boulevard Atlantic
  • Publix Planned Completion: Second Quarter 2022
  • Estimated overall completion of the shopping center: summer 2022
  • Total estimated initial cost: $ 9.7 million
  • Site area: 3.25 acres
  • Tenants with signed leases: Publix and Orangetheory Fitness
  • State of construction: exterior concrete block walls are in place and infrastructure work is underway
  • Developer: Regency Centers
  • Contractor: Construction J. Raymond
read more
1 2 3 4 5 17
Page 3 of 17